Thursday, June 13, 2013

More Chase Bank Misconduct: Raul Dearmas v. J P Morgan Chase Bank NA et al

Fruit for Judicial Estoppel? Admission in the excerpt below. 
This additional litigation now partially stemming from  
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA vs. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.

Courthouse News Service

Wednesday, June 12, 2013Last Update: 6:41 AM PT

Bank Misconduct

LOS ANGELES - J.P Morgan Chase Bank maliciously sues California homebuyers, without evidence, to coerce them into giving up their homes, Raul Dearmas claims in Federal Court. 

__________________________________________________________________________________

Complaint for Fraudulent and Unlawful Debt-Collection Practices ...

May 9, 2013 – THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA vsJPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; CHASE BANK USA, N.A; CHASE BANKCARD SERVICES, INC ...
__________________________________________________________________________________



Inline image 2


 . . .

Inline image 2
. . .
Inline image 3

Well now lets see among OTHER things JP is claiming pursuant to the PAA that they are Successor-in-Interest and WAMU is a goner? But what about all the NOD's in foreclosure cases that NAME WaMu as the beneficiary? And a constellation of  other questions that could be raised by this admission.
Inline image 4
. . .
Inline image 5


Inline image 1
Justia > Dockets & Filings > California > California Central District Court > Torts - Injury 
Other Personal Injury > Raul Dearmas v. J P Morgan Chase Bank NA et al

Raul Dearmas v. J P Morgan Chase Bank NA et al


Plaintiff:Raul Dearmas
Defendants:J P Morgan Chase Bank NA, Leslie Ann Lunsford and Wong Fleming PC
 
Case Number:2:2013cv04173
Filed: June 11, 2013
 
Court:California Central District Court
Presiding Judge:John F. Walter
Referring Judge:Patrick J. Walsh
 
Nature of Suit:Torts - Injury - Other Personal Injury

No comments:

Post a Comment